The Job Market Landscape in 2025: AI, Long-Term Unemployment and What’s at Stake

The Job Market Landscape in 2025: AI, Long-Term Unemployment and What’s at Stake

In 2025, the arrival of more advanced artificial intelligence tools such as generative AI and large language models (LLMs), is reshaping the labour market in real and measurable ways. At the same time, long-term unemployment (i.e., people out of meaningful work for 12 months or more) is emerging as a critical risk. This blog explores how these forces interact, what the implications are, and what we — as individuals, organisations and society — can do to overcome the challenge.

What’s happening: AI’s impact on employment

A. Displacement risk and uncertainty

  • A recent report by Jefferies finds that AI’s most significant labour-disruption effect may begin with entry-level white-collar roles: sales, customer-support, software development, marketing, jobs where younger or less experienced workers tend to start. ETHRWorld.com
  • According to Goldman Sachs research, if AI is broadly adopted it could threaten up to 6-7% of U.S. jobs; their baseline scenario: perhaps a 0.5 percentage-point rise in unemployment during the transition. Goldman Sachs
  • At the same time, research by the St. Louis Fed shows a positive correlation between AI exposure and unemployment increases in certain occupations between 2022 and 2025 (for example “computers & math” roles) — correlation ~0.47. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis


B. Contradictory but nuanced findings

  • On the flip side, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects continued employment growth for many occupations that will use AI—software developers, database architects, engineers. Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • A study published in “AI and jobs: A review of theory, estimates, evidence” (2025) finds that the picture is far from clear: the “productivity gains” from AI are sizeable (15-60%), but the impact on employment remains mixed and very context-dependent. arXiv


C. Long-term unemployment risk driver

When job displacement occurs, one of the most dangerous outcomes is long-term unemployment: if workers cannot find new roles quickly, gaps in employment grow, skills drift, networks fade, and the cost, in human and economic terms, rises disproportionately.
With AI accelerating task automation and reducing demand for some entry-level or junior roles, the risk is that more workers get stuck “between jobs” for longer. As one analysis warns: “In the next jobs downturn … the speed and breadth of the adoption of AI tools … might induce large scale displacement for occupations that consist of primarily non-routine cognitive tasks.” Axios


D. Winners and losers: skills, age, experience

  • Entry-level workers and new graduates appear to be especially vulnerable. For example, one report notes the unemployment rate for recent college grads (22-27 yrs) reached 5.8% in the U.S., substantially higher than the national average, and analysts link this in part to AI-driven shifts in hiring. CBS News
  • On the other hand, workers in roles with high “complementarity” with AI (i.e., skills that AI augments rather than replaces—digital fluency, problem solving, collaboration) are seeing benefits: e.g., PwC’s 2025 Jobs Barometer reports a 56% wage premium for AI-skilled workers and higher productivity gains in AI-exposed industries. PwC


Why long-term unemployment matters (and why AI exacerbates it)

Long-term unemployment isn’t just a badge of time out of work. It has cascading consequences:

  • Absence from the labour market erodes skills and networks. The longer someone is out of work, the harder it is to re-enter at a comparable level.
  • Gaps generate employer signalling problems: hiring managers may view a long gap as a risk.
  • Economic costs mount: individuals lose income, savings deplete; societies bear welfare and social-cost burdens.
  • With AI changing the nature of many jobs, there’s a mismatch risk: even when jobs exist, they may demand different skills than those displaced workers have.
  • When AI enables firms to “wait” rather than hire (or to automate rather than back-fill), the velocity of job creation may slow, compounding the long-term unemployment risk.


So, when AI ramps up tasks traditionally done by humans (especially junior, repetitive tasks), there is a dual effect: first, displacement or reduction in job openings; second, increased difficulty for displaced workers to pivot into new roles quickly, hence more long-term unemployment.


How to overcome the risk: strategies for individuals, firms and policy makers

Here are concrete, actionable strategies at each level.

A. Individuals: staying resilient in the AI-age workforce

  1. Adopt a “learn-to-learn” mindset — persistently upgrade your skill-set. Focus not just on technical tools but on complementary skills (digital literacy, collaboration, adaptability). Research shows AI increases demand for these “human-plus-AI” skills. arXiv+1
  2. Leverage AI rather than fear it — demonstrating ability to use AI tools can make you more employable (for example, AI-augmented productivity, prompt-management, oversight roles). As an internal memo from Amazon’s CEO noted: “be curious about AI, educate yourself, attend workshops… use and experiment with AI whenever you can.” The Washington Post
  3. Pivot horizontally if needed: If your field is heavily exposed to automation (e.g., entry-level clerical, routine white-collar tasks), consider moving into adjacent fields with higher human value or more AI-complementary roles.
  4. Build your professional brand and network — when long unemployment looms, strong networks and demonstrable project work (freelance, volunteer, portfolio) help overcome signalling issues.
  5. Stay prepared for transition — keep finances in order, maintain employability (certifications, micro-credentials), and be open to part-time, contract or gig roles as stepping stones rather than waiting for “ideal” jobs.


B. Firms: designing workforce strategy for an AI world

  1. Focus on augmenting not just automating — treat AI as a tool to boost worker productivity rather than simply replacing workers. That helps preserve employment and mitigate long-term unemployment risks. Research supports that AI augmentation lifts wages and demand for higher-skill roles. arXiv
  2. Invest in training and internal mobility — as roles shift, firms should offer training, re-skilling and pathways for existing workers to move into new, higher-value roles rather than being laid off or becoming idle.
  3. Design entry-level pathways consciously — since junior roles are most at risk, firms should maintain “learning-on-the-job” programs, apprenticeships, and roles that leverage newcomers while also embracing AI. Let AI handle the repetitive parts; keep humans in roles that emphasise growth, judgement and creativity.
  4. Monitor hiring & workforce metrics — track how AI adoption is impacting job openings, internal transitions and long-tenure unemployment risk in your workforce. Be proactive rather than reactive.
  5. Partner with education/providers — collaborate with learning institutions (colleges, bootcamps, online platforms) to align curricula with the new task composition of jobs (i.e., mixing AI-tool fluency with human skills).


C. Policymakers & society: structural support for the transition

  1. Reskilling & lifelong learning infrastructure — Governments should fund or incentivize lifelong learning programmes, especially for workers in mid-career who face displacement or stagnation.
  2. Support for long-term unemployed — targeted programmes for workers out of job for 12 + months: subsidies, retraining vouchers, targeted hiring incentives.
  3. Labour standards & safety nets — as AI speeds productivity, ensure that gains are shared (wage growth, job quality) rather than simply reducing workforce size and increasing inequality. For instance, some thinkers propose “token-tax” or levies on AI-driven revenue to support reskilling or basic income. Axios
  4. Entry-level job creation — since early-career workers are disproportionately affected, policies may need to support hiring of younger/new graduates (wage subsidies, internship programmes, public-service employment opportunities).
  5. Regular labour-market monitoring and forecasting — government agencies must incorporate AI exposure in their projections (see BLS’s “Incorporating AI impacts in employment projections”) so that interventions can be timely. Bureau of Labor Statistics


Key take-aways and next steps

  • AI is changing jobs, not simply eliminating them. Many roles will evolve rather than vanish. But the risk of long-term unemployment grows because of mismatches in skill, availability of entry roles and speed of transition.
  • New entrants (graduates, early-career) are especially vulnerable. The job market’s “first rung” is shifting: entry-level roles that used to involve routine tasks are now either automated or altered. The Guardian+1
  • Skills matter more than ever. Especially skills that complement AI: creativity, judgement, digital fluency, collaboration, problem-solving. The more you can work with AI rather than compete with it, the better positioned you’ll be.
  • Proactivity is essential. Waiting for the market to “return to normal” is risky. The faster the adoption of AI tools, the faster transitions happen—and the harder it may be to catch up after a long gap.
  • Society must manage the transition. Without structural supports and new paradigms for work, training and employment, we risk a future where productivity rises but human employment and opportunity stagnate.


Personal reflection & action plan for job seekers

Here’s a simple action-plan you can use:

  1. Map your risk and opportunity: List your current role and tasks. Identify how many of them could be automated/augmented by AI. Then identify which adjacent roles or tasks are more “AI-safe” (i.e., human-intensive).
  2. Choose one “upgrade” skill this quarter (for example: prompt-engineering, data-literacy, digital collaboration, AI-tool workflow). Dedicate weekly time to it.
  3. Build a portfolio or evidence of adaptability: even small side-projects or volunteer work that involves AI or digital tools count.
  4. Cultivate a professional network: especially peers who are also navigating change. Join communities, online forums, local meetups.
  5. Monitor the labour-market signals: job-ads in your field—what skills they ask now vs. two years ago? What roles are disappearing or transforming? Stay informed.
  6. Stay financially resilient: have a buffer, keep options open (part-time, freelancing), remain flexible in role, location or industry if needed.
  7. Advocate for change: Speak with managers, HR, local policy makers about training programmes, entry-level opportunities, lifelong-learning support. Be a part of shaping the transition, not passive in it.

Conclusion

The transition driven by AI is real, but it’s not inevitably catastrophic. The risk of long-term unemployment, however, is very tangible if individuals, firms and policymakers remain passive. The key lies in adaptation, reskilling, foresight and structural support. As we move into the later part of the decade, the gap between those who ride the wave of AI and those left behind may widen. But with deliberate action, the wave can be a ladder, not a barrier.

The eBook Cracking the ATS Code: Job Hunting in the Age of AI provides a step-by-step guide on how to create optimized content and get past the technology barriers in the job market. You can find the book here:  https://a.co/d/52EHugZ For additional resources, check out https://compasscareerpath.com to get insightful and relevant blogs as well as resources for job seekers at all levels.